Freedom of Speech

Pro-Life charity worker arrested AGAIN for silent prayer

Isabel Vaghan Spruce
"It is deeply concerning that the basic rights of freedom of thought, peaceful expression, and individual liberty are even up for debate."
Jeremiah Igunnuble

Pro-life charity worker Isabel Vaughan-Spruce has been arrested for the second time for the 'offence' of praying silently in an abortion facility 'buffer zone' in Birmingham.

The arrest, which was attended by six officers, comes just a few weeks after she was found not guilty by Birmingham Magistrates' Court.

Ms Vaughan-Spruce's appearance in court came after her first arrest for silent prayer and she was criminally charged on the basis that her prayer amounted to 'intimidation'.

The prosecution could not provide enough evidence to substantiate the 'thoughtcrime' and so Isabel won her case.

Supported by ADF UK, commenting on her second arrest, Isabel said:

Only three weeks ago, it was made clear by the court that my silent prayers were not a crime. And yet, again, I have been arrested and treated as a criminal for having the exact same thoughts in my head, in the same location. The ambiguity of laws that limit free expression and thought – even in peaceful, consensual conversation or in silent, internal prayer – leads to abject confusion, to the detriment of important fundamental rights. Nobody should be criminalised for their thoughts.
Isabel Vaughan-Spruce

MPs pre­pare to debate buf­fer zone law

Her arrest comes as MPs prepare to debate the possible roll out of a nationwide (England and Wales) buffer zone policy.

Clause 10 of the Public Order Bill would criminalise any form of 'influencing' outside abortion clinics and facilities. This would include silent prayer or consensual, peaceful conversations.

Andrew Lewer MP has proposed an amendment to the bill which would grant an exemption for silent prayer and consensual conversations.

MPs could vote on this amendment later today (Tuesday, 7 March 2023).

ADF UK's Jeremiah Igunnubole, said:

MPs will for the first time in Modern British history be able to vote to make it abundantly clear that there is no room for “thoughtcrime” in modern UK law. It is deeply concerning that the basic rights of freedom of thought, peaceful expression, and individual liberty are even up for debate. This isn’t 1984, but 2023 – nobody should be criminalised for their thoughts, for their prayers, and for a consensual conversation on a public street.
Jeremiah Igunnubole

Share

Free Speech min
Freedom of Speech

Recent news in Freedom of Speech

  1. Belgium police shut down conservative conference

    Freedom of Speech