Concerns raised over wedding law overhaul as traditional marriage loses its meaning

The government has introduced sweeping reforms to marriage law in the UK, giving couples more choice over where they can marry.

Announced by the Ministry of Justice, the plans mark the most extensive overhaul of marriage legislation in more than a century.

Couples will soon be able to wed in almost any location deemed “appropriate and dignified”, including beaches, gardens and private estates.

Officials say the move will modernise an outdated system and reflect “the diversity of modern Britain.”

However, critics argue that by removing many of the formal structures and legal settings traditionally associated with marriage, the government risks undermining the very institution it seeks to promote.

Figures already show a long-term decline in church weddings and faith-based ceremonies, with many concerned that the reforms will accelerate that trend.

Under the changes, legally binding marriages will be recognised across more faiths, including Sikh, Muslim, Buddhist and Hindu traditions.

For the first time, non-religious groups such as Humanists will also be permitted to conduct legally recognised ceremonies.

While the government has presented this as a step towards equality, some fear it signals a growing shift away from viewing marriage as a covenant before God.

Minister for Family Law, Baroness Levitt KC, said the plans will “allow couples to have the wedding day of their dreams” and “protect the solemnity and dignity of marriage while providing more choice.”

The government expects the reforms to boost the economy by £535 million over ten years, supporting 1,800 new businesses and 12,000 jobs.

The Law Commission first called for change in 2022, saying marriage law was “out of date, complex and uncertain.” The government will consult on the proposals early next year before bringing forward legislation “when parliamentary time allows.”

As marriage increasingly shifts from sacred vow to personal celebration, many warn that what is gained in flexibility may come at the cost of its deeper meaning.