Up to 30 MPs may withdraw support for Assisted Dying Bill

Up to 30 MPs who initially supported the Assisted Dying Bill may withdraw their backing in the forthcoming parliamentary vote, citing concerns over potential coercion and the role of medical professionals.

The committee reviewing Kim Leadbeater’s Assisted Dying Bill is set to commence hearings in the new year.

Several MPs are advocating for amendments, particularly to prohibit medical professionals from suggesting assisted suicide to terminally ill patients.

Former Conservative minister David Davis emphasised, "The bill must be changed so medical professionals cannot suggest assisted dying to terminally ill patients." Labour MPs Chris Webb and Mike Tapp, who previously voted in favour, share this stance.

Mike Tapp says for the issue to be raised by the patient helps to “mitigate the risk of accidental coercion, or the perception of a hint, at a time of immense emotional distress and vulnerability.”

This proposed amendment may lead to a conflict with the British Medical Association (BMA), which opposes withholding treatment options from patients. The BMA has stated that doctors should be trusted to use their professional judgment in such situations.

Some MPs view this amendment as essential for the bill's progression. One MP suggested that the current majority could diminish: "I think that 55 majority will start [being chipped away at]. I think it will pass probably between 20 and 30."

The Assisted Dying Bill, which passed its second reading with a 55-vote majority, proposes allowing terminally ill adults with less than six months to live to end their lives.

However, concerns persist regarding the adequacy of safeguards against coercion and the potential impact on vulnerable individuals. Paralympic athlete Tanni Grey-Thompson urged MPs to reject the legislation, warning of a "slippery slope" and significant effects on people with disabilities.

Roz Savage, a Lib Dem MP who voted in favour of the bill because she believed “people should have choice, but if it’s to be a genuine choice then hospice care needs to be a viable, affordable, accessible option – and for too many it isn’t.

The bill's future remains uncertain as MPs prepare for further debates and potential amendments in the coming year.