CARE: Christian Action, Research and Education

For what you believe
Open menu Close menu

'Home Abortions: just a phone call or text away'.

Philippa Taylor

Pills Credit thanasus Shutterstock CNA

Under the guise of the coronavirus lockdown abortion campaigners have taken the opportunity to lobby the UK Government to substantially change the rules around abortion pills, something they have been wanting to do for years, as this blog explains.

This week, they have been successful in their campaign. Now women will be able to take two powerful drugs, the abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol, in their own home in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.

Previously women had to be given mifepristone at a clinic or hospital (this kills the fetus) by a registered medical professional. Up to 48 hours later they would be administered misoprostol, which they could take at the clinic or (from 2018) at home, to expel the fetus.

Now, to the delight of the abortion lobby, the pill manufacturers and abortionists, the Government have also removed any requirement for a registered medical practitioner to actually see or even talk to a woman. Instead ‘consultations’ can take place by video, telephone or ‘other electronic means’.

Perhaps the abortion lobby persuaded the Government that using telemedicine is the way to go, since many more GP surgeries are introducing it. However the use of the vague term ‘other electronic means’ does not just mean that consultations must only take place by video or facetime or even telephone calls, there is nothing to stop it including ‘consultation’ by email or texts, or why not private messaging via social media?

With an email or text there would be no means of knowing:

who really is on the other end of an email or text

if what (she) is saying is correct

if (she) really is only 10 weeks gestation or less

if (she) really lives where she says

if (she) is following medical protocols

if will be used by (her) or someone else

if (she) is on her own at home or has adult support

if there is someone coercing her into having an abortion,

if the respondent is an abuser controlling her.

All remaining protections for women’s health and safety have been removed in one go.

How much debate or scrutiny did this significant change in abortion practice receive? None.

It was done pretty well overnight and undercover, despite the Government spokesman stating literally a few days before that they had no intention of changing the law. Yet its effect will be significant since 71% of abortions are now medical, using pills, in England and Wales, while 86% in Scotland are medical.

These two powerful drugs can cause serious complications, particularly if not used within the medical protocols, or in spite of contraindications. I have detailed in this briefing paper some of the significant safety concerns with their use. For example, medical abortions cause four times more serious complications than surgical, and a quarter of women experience serious complications from medical abortions, including heavy bleeding, infection, severe abdominal pain and hospitalisation from incomplete or failed abortions.

Moreover, what is less well known, the pills are less effective, and more harmful, when taken later in gestation, which is presumably why the Government regulations stipulate their use only up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. But many pregnant women do not know their gestation until they have a dating scan. And women, when guessing, tend to underestimate their gestation. Usually the last menstrual period (LMP) is used to estimate gestational age, but LMP alone is not the best obstetric estimate because it assumes a regular menstrual cycle. Studies report that approximately one half of women do not accurately recall their LMP (see here too, p10).

The later women take the two pills, the more dangerous it becomes and the more emotionally traumatic, as they flush a recognisable baby down the toilet.

The previous President of the RCOG and vociferous abortion campaigner, Lesley Regan, has said that ‘abortions should be treated no differently from other medical procedures – including something as simple as removing a bunion.’

The irony now is that bunion removal requires fully informed consent, provision of information on its risks, and the direct, face to face, involvement of medical professionals. Bunion removals are not arranged by texts or emails and then left for the patient to carry out!

So Regan has got even more than she asked for. A medical abortion is now being treated as even more minor than removing a bunion, despite the fact that it requires two sets of chemical drugs powerful enough to destroy and then expel a living human being from the safety of a mother’s womb.

This article is by Philippa Taylor, who works for CARE

Receive news from CARE each week

By signing up stay in touch you agree to receive emails from CARE. You can change your mailing preferences at any time either by getting in touch with CARE, or through the links on any of our emails.



In any pregnancy, both the woman and preborn baby have inherent value and dignity, by virtue of being made in the image of God. CARE is passionately pro-woman and pro-life.

Find out more about the cause