CARE: Christian Action, Research and Education

For what you believe
Open menu Close menu

Why marriage makes a more satisfying relationship

James Mildred

Brooke cagle o Mt XG Nw4 Z Es unsplash

What makes a satisfying relationship? A recent study sought to answer this question.

The researchers, who took data from 11,196 couples, found that the following five factors mattered most for both present and future relationship satisfaction:

  1. Perceived partner commitment
  2. Appreciation
  3. Sexual satisfaction
  4. Perceived partner satisfaction
  5. Conflict

Interestingly, the study found that personality characteristics explain little about relationship satisfaction. In fact, what matters most in a relationship is your perception of your partner’s behaviour towards you — in particular how much you think they are committed to the relationship.

This suggests there is a correlation between commitment and satisfaction: the more you perceive your partner to be committed to you, the more satisfied you will be.

So what exactly is a 'committed' relationship? Predominantly, these relationships tend to take two forms in today’s society: cohabitation and marriage.

The inevitable question then must be: which form of relationship leads to a higher perception of commitment in your partner, and, therefore, more satisfaction?

Brooke cagle Y3 L Z Qaw9 Wo unsplash
What matters most in a relationship is your perception of your partner’s behaviour towards you — in particular how much you think they are committed to the relationship.

The impact of asymmetrical commitment

One major factor that leads to dissatisfaction in relationships is what is known as ‘asymmetrical commitment’: when one individual is substantially more committed to the relationship than the other, or at least is perceived to be so. This causes ambiguity in the relationship — a lack of clarity regarding mutual commitment and relationship status.

Dr. Scott Stanley, Research Professor and Co-Director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver, has studied this extensively.

In general, he argues, asymmetrical commitment is more common in cohabitation. In cohabiting relationships, a sense of ambiguity is more likely to be present and can lead to one partner misinterpreting the behaviour of the other:

“Anything that constrains your options, or your partner’s, limits the information contained in the choices made. That means that some people are routinely misinterpreting the behavior of their partners, and thinking that something may signal commitment when it does not. It also means that some couples who have been together a while with an unclear future, who also have the constraints that come with living together, will have difficulty accurately reading the commitment in each other about a future, together.”
Dr Scott Stanley Research Professor, University of Denver

Ambiguity leads to relationship breakdown and disatisfaction

The impact of this ambiguity ultimately leads to relationship breakdown. This is apparent in the data: cohabiting couples are less likely to remain together than married couples, particularly after having children. Even couples who cohabit before marriage are more likely to get divorced.

Cohabitation also leads to less satisfaction in marriage. In the same study, respondents who cohabited with their eventual spouse, before having a mutual and clear commitment to marry, reported lower levels of marital quality than couples who waited until marriage before moving in together.

One reason for this is that decision making is less clear in cohabiting relationships, and creates false constraints (such as renting a flat together, sharing furniture or a dog) that keep people in a relationship when they otherwise would end it.

According to one study, living together ‘creates a kind of inertia that makes it difficult to change course’, which is compounded by the fact that people ‘slide’ into living together, rather than making an active decision to do so.

As Harry Benson of the Marriage Foundation argues, avoiding intentional decision making about the future is a red flag:

"I think the biggest barrier for all couples to overcome at some stage in their relationship is moving from ambiguity to clarity. So, at some point, everyone has to have a serious conversation about their future. And when that is, that’s definitely an open question. And the risk to a relationship is that you don't have that conversation."
Harry Benson Researcher, The Marriage Foundation & Author of 'Commit or Quit: The Two-Year Rule and Other Rules for Romance'
Erda estremera sx Nt9g77 PE0 unsplash
Decision making is less clear in cohabiting relationships, and creates false constraints (such as renting a flat together, sharing furniture or a dog) that keep people in a relationship when they otherwise would end it.

Some might argue that couples that cohabit long term have demonstrated the same commitment to each other as any married couple. But this does not bear out in the data. In fact, as Benson discovered in his research, in cohabiting relationships the chances of staying together do not improve with longevity:

"Over time, the longer people live together, two interesting things happened. One was that the chances of splitting up never improved (and that's quite different to married couples, where divorce rates fall once you get past the first few years, and they fall pretty consistently with every single year of marriage together). With cohabiting couples, that's not true. The odds never improve. And that's pretty stunning. Staying together longer does not help your cause. So that tells me that it makes sense to make a commitment at some point where you have sufficient information."
Harry Benson Researcher, The Marriage Foundation & Author of 'Commit or Quit: The Two-Year Rule and Other Rules for Romance'

In contrast, married couples are much less likely to have asymmetrical commitment. In a relationship where marriage is the ultimate intention, leading towards marriage forces a couple into decision making about their relationship. There is no sense of just 'sliding' into marriage. The clarity of a marriage partnership, both culturally and legally, dispels ambiguity.

What signifies a committed relationship?

Dr. Stanley argues that cohabitation is also not a good way of signifying commitment
, even though it is popular on the dating scene.

In fact, he argues, it is often only marriage that signifies a committed relationship to others:

“If a couple tells you that they are married, you know a lot about their commitment. That does not mean that all is perfect, of course. Likewise, if a couple tells you that they have clear, mutual plans to marry, you can infer there is a lot of commitment”
Dr Scott Stanley Research Professor, University of Denver
Taylor hernandez NK N6coe I5 Y unsplash
The clarity of a marriage partnership, both culturally and legally, dispels ambiguity.

Marriage is the best demonstration of commitment

Our culture has moved towards a trend where cohabitation is the first (and often last) form of union a couple forms. Yet this research leads to the ultimate conclusion that marriage provides a much better context for a satisfying relationship: marriage demonstrates your partner's commitment to you, and therefore you are more satisfied.

It is unsurprising, then, that around 80 percent of today’s young adults say that marriage is an ‘important part of their life plans.’

Marriage is ultimately the best way to avoid ambiguity and commit equally to one another — it is an act that signifies your full intention to remain committed to your spouse in all circumstances, until the end of your life.

Marriage is also one of the most important signifiers of commitment, and remains culturally and legally significant.

Yet, increasingly, cohabitation before, or instead, of marriage has become the norm. As Dr Stanley comments, the tragedy of this is that most people want lasting love in life, and most people still intend to accomplish that in marriage. However, the ways cohabitation has changed in the past three decades make it less likely that people who have that goal will succeed in it."

Perhaps it's time to rethink what we think will bring us the most satisfaction in a relationship.

Marriage isn't just a piece of paper. If our innate desire for a satisfying relationship is bound up in our desire for commitment in our partner, what better way to guarantee that then to declare in front of your family and friends that you are committing to one another ‘as long as you both shall live’?

Receive news from CARE each week

By signing up stay in touch you agree to receive emails from CARE. You can change your mailing preferences at any time either by getting in touch with CARE, or through the links on any of our emails.

Marriage

Marriage and Family

Strong families are foundational to a healthy society. Marriages too are vital, representing the gold standard of commitment. CARE is committed to upholding both.

Find out more about the cause