CARE: Christian Action, Research and Education

For what you believe
Open menu Close menu
Heidi Crowter abortion case
Abortion

Woman with Down’s challenges the Government over abortion for disabilities

28 February 2020

A 24-year old woman with Down’s syndrome is preparing to take the UK Government to court over the current abortion laws, under which it is legal to abort up to birth in cases of serious disability.

Heidi Crowter has Down’s and is from Coventry. She has joined together with Cheryl Bilsborrow from Preston, who’s two-year old son Hector also has Down’s syndrome.

In England, Wales and Scotland, abortion is available if the baby has a disability, including Down’s syndrome, cleft lip and club foot.

If the baby does not have any of these conditions, the current law means there is a 24-week limit.

The UN’s Committee on the Rights of Person’s with Disabilities’ concluding remarks on the initial report of the UK said that the UK should change its abortion law on disability, so it no longer singles out babies with disabilities. But the Government has decided to ignore this recommendation.

In 2018, there were 3,269 disability-selective abortions and 618 of these were for Down’s syndrome. This is a 42% increase in abortion for Down’s in the last 10 years.

Heidi Crowter said:

“At the moment in the UK, babies can be aborted right up to birth if they are considered to be ‘seriously handicapped’. They include me in that definition of being seriously handicapped – just because I have an extra chromosome! Can you believe that?

“What it says to me is that my life just isn’t as valuable as others, and I don’t think that’s right. I think it’s downright discrimination!

“The United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities recently said that the United Kingdom should change its abortion law to make sure that people like me aren’t singled out because of our disabilities.

“Sadly, the Government decided to ignore their recommendations and didn’t change the law. So now, I am going to take the Government to court with other members of the Down’s syndrome community to make sure that people aren’t treated differently because of their disabilities.”

Paul Conrathe, the claimant’s solicitor from Sinclairslaw, said:

“This case addresses a matter that is fundamentally offensive and discriminatory- that unborn babies with a disability, and in this case Down’s syndrome, should be aborted up to birth. The current law reinforces negative stereotypes and attributes lesser value and dignity to people with disability.

“In bringing this landmark case the claimants seek judicial ruling that the Abortion Act 1967 impermissibly violates the dignity of people with disabilities.“

Help Heidi raise £20,000 for the legal challenge to the UK’s discriminatory abortion laws

There is a fundraising page for Heidi which can be accessed here.

Abort

Abortion

In any pregnancy, both the woman and preborn baby have inherent value and dignity, by virtue of being made in the image of God. CARE is passionately pro-woman and pro-life.

Find out more about the cause

Sign up for Impact Direct, and email publications

By signing up stay in touch you agree to receive emails from CARE. You can change your mailing preferences at any time either by getting in touch with CARE, or through the links on any of our emails.

Recent news

Gambling machines 2 5 j

NI Communities Minister hints at gambling law reform by 2022

The Communities Minister for Northern Ireland has said she hopes to be able to legislate to reform gambling law before the end of the Assembly’s current mandate in March 2022.

Keep reading
Yellow social media apps phone f1

Surge in sexually explicit texts sent by children during lockdown

New research suggests girls as young as six have been sending sexually explicit texts during the coronavirus pandemic.

Keep reading
Shutterstock 300750932 0 0

High Court rules Christian fostering agency’s recruitment policy was not unlawful

In an important free speech win, the High Court has said that a Christian fostering agency’s recruitment policy is not unlawful.

Keep reading